[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual
From: |
Jean Louis |
Subject: |
Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Mar 2021 10:06:14 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.0.6 (2021-03-06) |
Content-Type: text/enriched
Text-Width: 70
* Stefan Kangas <<stefankangas@gmail.com> [2021-03-18 16:40]:
> Jean Louis <<bugs@gnu.support> writes:
>
> >> facemenu makes some sense in enriched-mode (it's probably the only mode
> >> where it does make sense), but I'm not sure the `M-o' binding is ideal.
> >> Sticking it under `C-c C-<<letter>' might be better.
> >
> > Sounds complicated.
>
> Why is it more complicated than any other mode that puts bindings under
> C-c C-<<letter>?
Too many key strokes.
Compare it:
- M-o b -- it is quick and easy to make face bold.
- C-c C-o b -- is 3 key strokes
And I was thinking C-c will be reserverd for users.
- M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual, Jean Louis, 2021/03/16
- Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/03/17
- Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual, Jean Louis, 2021/03/18
- Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual, Stefan Kangas, 2021/03/18
- Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual, Stefan Monnier, 2021/03/18
- Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual,
Jean Louis <=
- Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/03/19
- Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual, Gregory Heytings, 2021/03/19
- Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual, Stefan Kangas, 2021/03/19
- Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual, Stefan Monnier, 2021/03/19
- Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/03/19
- Re: M-o should work in enriched-mode as usual, Jean Louis, 2021/03/20