[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gitlab Migration
From: |
Drew DeVault |
Subject: |
Re: Gitlab Migration |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Aug 2021 14:09:41 +0200 |
We do expect git send-email, but as a good practice, and I don't think
it's reasonable to support it as an attachment instead. However, we have
sent many usability improvements to git upstream and I have written an
interactive git send-email tutorial, which is recommended by the git
book and by the Linux kernel documentation:
https://git-send-email.io
- Re: Gitlab Migration, (continued)
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/08/28
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Theodor Thornhill, 2021/08/28
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Drew DeVault, 2021/08/28
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Daniel Fleischer, 2021/08/28
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Drew DeVault, 2021/08/28
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2021/08/28
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Alan Third, 2021/08/28
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Theodor Thornhill, 2021/08/28
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2021/08/28
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Theodor Thornhill, 2021/08/28
- Re: Gitlab Migration,
Drew DeVault <=
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/08/28
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Theodor Thornhill, 2021/08/28
- Re: Gitlab Migration, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/08/28
- GitLab feature request compared with SourceHut (was: Re: Gitlab Migration), Sean Whitton, 2021/08/27
- Re: GitLab feature request compared with SourceHut (was: Re: Gitlab Migration), Tassilo Horn, 2021/08/28
- Re: GitLab feature request compared with SourceHut, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/08/28
- Re: GitLab feature request compared with SourceHut, Ben Mezger, 2021/08/28
- Re: GitLab feature request compared with SourceHut, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/08/28
- Re: GitLab feature request compared with SourceHut, Tassilo Horn, 2021/08/28
- Re: GitLab feature request compared with SourceHut, Ben Mezger, 2021/08/28