Re: GitLab feature request compared with SourceHut

[Ben Mezger]

> Yes, that sounds like something that needs to work before we can make
> the switch.

One point though: sr.ht payment is currently optional, but they do
have plans to start requiring payments when they reach a certain
quality -- but perhaps this is negoatible given the the nature of the
project.

https://sourcehut.org/pricing/

Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> Tassilo Horn <tsdh@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Also, todo.sr.ht doesn't support attachments AFAIK, i.e., reports
>> accompanied with attached patches or screenshots illustrating the issue
>> aren't displayed.  So that's a major bummer which would need to be
>> worked on for making it suitable for emacs.
>
> Yes, that sounds like something that needs to work before we can make
> the switch.


--
Kind regards,
Met een vriendelijke groet,
Atenciosamente,

Ben Mezger

https://seds.nl
https://github.com/benmezger