Re: Proposal: Forwards-Compatibility Library for Emacs

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:

>> (And we certainly don't want to take on the maintenance burden of
>> writing subr-x in such a way that it's backwards-compatible.)
>
> Then the same problem will happen when you copy these functions
> into compat.el. Unless you do what Stefan says, and rename them.

No, the same problem doesn't exist in compat.el.  Philip's package
doesn't redefine functions in that way.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no