[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Shorthands have landed on master
From: |
João Távora |
Subject: |
Re: Shorthands have landed on master |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Sep 2021 10:17:49 +0100 |
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 10:14 AM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> > From: João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com>
> > Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 10:03:01 +0100
> > Cc: Adam Porter <adam@alphapapa.net>, Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>,
> > Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com>, emacs-devel <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
> >
> > Since elisp-shorthands is a file-local variable, I think it allows (eval)
> > specs.
>
> But that will be unsafe, no?
Yes, this is why I wrote "for now". It does seem plausible that
Emacs provides pre-canned alists of substitutions such as
the one used for reading 'loop' as 'cl-loop', 'second' as
'cl-second', and so on. Those would be "safe" AFAIK and we
could have a mechanism to mark them so.
João
- Better way to require with shorthands/renamed symbols, Stefan Kangas, 2021/09/27
- Re: Better way to require with shorthands/renamed symbols, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/09/27
- Shorthands have landed on master (Was: Better way to require with shorthands/renamed symbols), João Távora, 2021/09/27
- Re: Shorthands have landed on master (Was: Better way to require with shorthands/renamed symbols), Dmitry Gutov, 2021/09/27
- Re: Shorthands have landed on master, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/09/27
- Re: Shorthands have landed on master, João Távora, 2021/09/27
- Re: Shorthands have landed on master, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/09/28
- Re: Shorthands have landed on master, João Távora, 2021/09/28
- Re: Shorthands have landed on master, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/09/28
- Re: Shorthands have landed on master,
João Távora <=
- Re: Shorthands have landed on master, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/09/28
- Re: Shorthands have landed on master (Was: Better way to require with shorthands/renamed symbols), Richard Stallman, 2021/09/28
Re: Better way to require with shorthands/renamed symbols, João Távora, 2021/09/27
- Re: Better way to require with shorthands/renamed symbols, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/09/27
- Re: Better way to require with shorthands/renamed symbols, João Távora, 2021/09/27
- Re: Better way to require with shorthands/renamed symbols, Stefan Kangas, 2021/09/27
- Re: Better way to require with shorthands/renamed symbols, João Távora, 2021/09/27
- Re: Better way to require with shorthands/renamed symbols, Stefan Kangas, 2021/09/27
- Re: Better way to require with shorthands/renamed symbols, João Távora, 2021/09/27
- Re: Better way to require with shorthands/renamed symbols, T.V Raman, 2021/09/27