RE: [External] : Adding a binding for 'undo-redo'

[Drew Adams]

>    The "technical hurdle" of finding a good binding
>    isn't the place to start.  The place to start is
>    to wait for users to use and bind it, and then
>    see how much a default binding would make sense.
> 
> Here lies chaos.
> 
> For coherent design, and logical keybindings, one cannot wait until
> users have bound a key.  It is a good indication of what might be
> used, but not what might make sense in the grand picture.

There may not be a reason to always wait - agreed.
("One cannot wait" ever is clearly wrong, though.)

It doesn't follow that every command should get a
default key binding.  And how new the redo command
is isn't really the question, on its own.

The question really should be how useful the command
is, in practice: How much are users using it, and how
important would it be for it to have a default binding?