Re: XInput 2 support (again)

[Po Lu]

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

> AFAICT that was 2009.  So, yes, old but not quite as ancient as some of
> the other things we try to support.

> So it looks like for the next few years we'll still want to support the
> non-XInput2 code.

Yes, that would be a good idea.  It would be good to support it for even
longer, as people have the habit of turning XInput off when using X11
remoting, because they think it uses more bandwidth (though I've never
seen evidence that conclusively proves it).

Thanks.