[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Development Speed
From: |
Po Lu |
Subject: |
Re: Development Speed |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Dec 2021 19:37:57 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
xenodasein--- via "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
writes:
> I also wonder why, and this subject might need it's own thread. My first
> guess is that their code is more approachable, whatever all that entails.
I was asking for evidence that Neovim has more contributions than Emacs,
and that it will last.
> I plan to ask about this topic again when I am more knowledgeable, if that
> is okay. Thanks for your insight.
Thanks. A word of advice is to not trust every article posted on an
internet blog or social media about the internals of Emacs. I find much
of that content to be plain misinformation.
> Why not, assuming it is at some point considered to be beneficial by
> maintainers?
Right now it's not, I think. Even C11 would require dropping many
platforms that are currently supported, not to mention C17.
Re: Development Speed, xenodasein, 2021/12/21
Re: Development Speed, Stefan Kangas, 2021/12/21
Re: Development Speed, Theodor Thornhill, 2021/12/21
Re: Development Speed, xenodasein, 2021/12/21
Re: Development Speed, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/21
Re: Development Speed, Richard Stallman, 2021/12/21