Re: Tree-sitter api

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>
> Cc: John Yates <john@yates-sheets.org>,  Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>,
>  Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>,  ubolonton@gmail.com,  Emacs developers
>  <emacs-devel@gnu.org>,  Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,  yoavm448@gmail.com,
>  Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2022 09:56:21 +0800
> 
> "treesit" sounds rather ambiguous and ugly, while "treesitt" is only 3
> letters away from "tree-sitter".  Instead of bikeshedding over a name,
> why not use shorthands to refer to "tree-sitter" in files where the
> column number limit is actually important?  Isn't that what shorthands
> were intended to solve?

As mentioned before, we don't want to use shorthands for core
features, and I'm not even sure there's a good way of doing that when
some of the feature is in primitives written in C.