Re: Tree-sitter api

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 16:00:28 -0700
> Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>,
>  yoavm448@gmail.com,
>  emacs-devel@gnu.org,
>  ubolonton@gmail.com
> 
> > 
> > If so, I think we should have our own load-path for these
> > libraries; relying on the standard LD_LIBRARY_PATH etc. is not good
> > enough (although we should support that as well).  I envision that at
> > least in some cases users will not want to have these libraries in the
> > public places, or maybe even won't have the requisite access rights to
> > do so.  We should provide Emacs-style alternatives, like some
> > subdirectory of ~/.emacs.d/ and/or under ${prefix}/lib/ (similar to
> > *.eln files).
> 
> Anyone have thoughts on this?

What kind of thoughts?  Whether or not to provide this feature (I
think we should), or how best to implement that?  Or something else?