[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: etags name collision.
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: etags name collision. |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Apr 2022 16:10:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) |
On Apr 11 2022, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> It's the other way around: ctags was a very old Unix program, and
> Emacs developed a GNU version of that program. Universal ctags came
> much later. So you should ask them why did they decide to use a name
> that was already taken.
They are both implementation of the POSIX utility ctags, with
extensions.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
- Re: [PATCH] Re: etags name collision., (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] Re: etags name collision., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2022/04/12
- Re: [PATCH] Re: etags name collision., Eli Zaretskii, 2022/04/12
- Re: etags name collision., Stefan Monnier, 2022/04/11
- Re: etags name collision., Eli Zaretskii, 2022/04/11
- Re: etags name collision., Stefan Monnier, 2022/04/11
- Re: etags name collision., Eli Zaretskii, 2022/04/11
- Re: etags name collision., Ulrich Mueller, 2022/04/11
- Re: etags name collision., Thierry Volpiatto, 2022/04/12
- Re: etags name collision., Ergus, 2022/04/11
- Re: etags name collision., Ergus, 2022/04/11
Re: etags name collision.,
Andreas Schwab <=
Re: etags name collision., Kaushal Modi, 2022/04/11
Re: etags name collision., Richard Stallman, 2022/04/11