Re: etags name collision.

[Stefan Monnier]

Eli Zaretskii [2022-04-11 17:09:53] wrote:
> I'm opposed to dropping stuff just because we can.  If you want to add
> an option not to install ctags if another version is installed
> (similarly to what we do with movemail), that's fine.  But please
> don't argue for dropping parts of Emacs unconditionally because you
> personally find it not useful, that argument will never fly with me.

Maybe we should install it under a different name, to avoid
the conflict but without losing the functionality?


        Stefan