[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: etags name collision.
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: etags name collision. |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Apr 2022 17:09:53 +0300 |
> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 15:47:49 +0200
> From: Ergus <spacibba@aol.com>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
>
> >Emacs doesn't need ctags
>
> So we shouldn't provide ctags by default.
I'm opposed to dropping stuff just because we can. If you want to add
an option not to install ctags if another version is installed
(similarly to what we do with movemail), that's fine. But please
don't argue for dropping parts of Emacs unconditionally because you
personally find it not useful, that argument will never fly with me.
- Re: etags name collision., (continued)
- Re: etags name collision., Ergus, 2022/04/12
- Re: etags name collision., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2022/04/12
- Re: etags name collision., Ergus, 2022/04/12
- Re: etags name collision., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2022/04/12
- Re: etags name collision., Dmitry Gutov, 2022/04/12
- Re: etags name collision., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2022/04/13
- Re: etags name collision., Stefan Monnier, 2022/04/12
- Re: etags name collision., Eli Zaretskii, 2022/04/11
- Re: etags name collision., Andreas Schwab, 2022/04/11
Re: etags name collision., Ergus, 2022/04/11
- Re: etags name collision.,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: etags name collision., Ergus, 2022/04/11
- [PATCH] Re: etags name collision., Ergus, 2022/04/11
- Re: [PATCH] Re: etags name collision., Eli Zaretskii, 2022/04/11
- Re: [PATCH] Re: etags name collision., Ergus, 2022/04/11
- Re: [PATCH] Re: etags name collision., Eli Zaretskii, 2022/04/11
- Re: [PATCH] Re: etags name collision., Ergus, 2022/04/11
- Re: [PATCH] Re: etags name collision., Ulrich Mueller, 2022/04/11
- Re: [PATCH] Re: etags name collision., Ergus, 2022/04/11
- Re: [PATCH] Re: etags name collision., Ulrich Mueller, 2022/04/11
- Re: [PATCH] Re: etags name collision., Ergus, 2022/04/11