Re: Comments to the new tree sitter implementation

[Theodor Thornhill]

Hi, there!

>
> Sorry that I can’t get back to you very soon. I’ve been incredibly
> busy recently. I’ll find time to look at your points and try to debug
> the problems you mention with typescript-ts.el.
>

No worries.  I'll just note one more thing because I remember it now:
Why are you calling the font lock default function after tree sitter has
done its job?  That seems like the wrong thing for several reasons:

1. Shouldn't tree sitter be sufficient?
2. It makes the default function get higher precedence than tree-sitter,
causing some troublesome behavior.

Specifically, if you set single-quote as a string in the syntax table,
to make the major mode understand it as a string delimiter, it will mess
up comments.  This example snippet will make the rest of the file
fontlock as a string:

```typescript
function foo() {
  // don't mark the rest of the file as a string because of this:
  //    ^
  const dont = 3;
  const do = "":
  const it = {};
}
```

If the last two lines of `tree-sitter-font-lock-fontify-region` are
removed, things appear to work as normal.  It also works fine with
things such as eglot marking a variable as unused in the comment face
etc.

All the best,
Theodor