|
From: | समीर सिंह Sameer Singh |
Subject: | Re: Not able to display \u110BD and \u110CD in Emacs |
Date: | Sat, 30 Apr 2022 10:22:00 +0530 |
I suggest to use font-at to get the font-object you need for
font-get-glyphs.
So the character is actually visible, it is just displayed as a thin
space. Which means that either its glyph in the font is like that, or
that the font lacks a glyph for it. What does "C-u C-x =" say when
the cursor is on that thin 1-pixel space?
> From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh <lumarzeli30@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 20:56:56 +0530
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
>
> Do they have any glyphs in the font? Did you try to use
> font-get-glyphs to see if the font can display those characters when
> they are alone?
>
>
> I am an extreme novice, so please bear with me, but I cannot get the function to work. I tried to enter the
> following as the argument FONT OBJECT but none worked:
> #<font-object "-GOOG-Noto Sans Kaithi-regular-normal-normal-*-23-*-*-*-*-0-iso10646-1">
> "-GOOG-Noto Sans Kaithi-regular-normal-normal-*-23-*-*-*-*-0-iso10646-1"
> "#<font-object -GOOG-Noto Sans Kaithi-regular-normal-normal-*-23-*-*-*-*-0-iso10646-1>"
> "Noto Sans Kaithi"
> "/usr/share/fonts/noto/NotoSansKaithi-Regular.ttf"
I suggest to use font-at to get the font-object you need for
font-get-glyphs.
> That's what your composition rules already do: they are only triggered
> when the character preceding the numerals is a number sign. So I
> don't think I understand the problem.
>
> I want the font of devanagari and kaithi to be different, but since kaithi uses devanagari numerals and a
> devanagari font other than Noto Sans Kaithi does not render the number signs, I was asking that is it
> possible to only change the devanagari font to Noto Sans Kaithi if it is around a number sign.
No, that's not possible, sorry.
> When you put the cursor at the number sign character, don't you see a
> thin 1-pixel space there?
>
> Yes, when the character is not visible in Emacs and whenI put the cursor in its place there is a thin 1-pixel
> space there.
So the character is actually visible, it is just displayed as a thin
space. Which means that either its glyph in the font is like that, or
that the font lacks a glyph for it. What does "C-u C-x =" say when
the cursor is on that thin 1-pixel space?
firefox-gmail.png
Description: PNG image
emacs.png
Description: PNG image
emacs-decomposition.png
Description: PNG image
font-forge.png
Description: PNG image
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |