[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Request to add tomelr package to GNU ELPA
From: |
Kaushal Modi |
Subject: |
Re: Request to add tomelr package to GNU ELPA |
Date: |
Tue, 3 May 2022 10:29:51 -0400 |
On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 9:09 AM Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks, I just pushed it to GNU ELPA.
Thanks! That was quick.
> "TOML aims to be a minimal configuration file format that's easy to read
> due to obvious semantics."
>
> I can't believe someone would write something like that with
> a straight face. [ Unless that someone is very naive, I guess. ]
> :-)
It's easy to read as long as you are dealing with normal INI style key
assignments and maps. But once you start having arrays of maps, I
agree that it's not very readable.
Reasons I like TOML: Concise spec, mutli-line strings support like
Python, indentation insensitivity. All of that makes the job of
auto-generating (and parsing) TOML very easy.
- Request to add tomelr package to GNU ELPA, Kaushal Modi, 2022/05/03
- Re: Request to add tomelr package to GNU ELPA, Stefan Monnier, 2022/05/03
- Re: Request to add tomelr package to GNU ELPA,
Kaushal Modi <=
- Re: Request to add tomelr package to GNU ELPA, Stefan Monnier, 2022/05/03
- Re: Request to add tomelr package to GNU ELPA, Robert Pluim, 2022/05/04
- Re: Request to add tomelr package to GNU ELPA, Stefan Monnier, 2022/05/04
- Re: Request to add tomelr package to GNU ELPA, Richard Stallman, 2022/05/05
- Re: Request to add tomelr package to GNU ELPA, Kaushal Modi, 2022/05/05
Re: Request to add tomelr package to GNU ELPA, tomas, 2022/05/03
Re: Request to add tomelr package to GNU ELPA, João Pedro, 2022/05/03