[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Request to add tomelr package to GNU ELPA
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Request to add tomelr package to GNU ELPA |
Date: |
Wed, 04 May 2022 09:02:16 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Robert Pluim [2022-05-04 09:10:03] wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 03 May 2022 10:38:13 -0400, Stefan Monnier
>>>>>> <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> said:
> Stefan> My point is just that it's only "easy to read" and "obvious" for
> those
> Stefan> already familiar with such syntax. Just as is the case for
> pretty much
> Stefan> all syntaxes.
>
> Letʼs be fair: unlike a certain other file format ending in 'ML', this
> one is not going to cause you to spend hours staring at a screen until
Don't get me wrong: I have no particular complaint abut the TOML syntax.
I just found the claim to be ridiculous. It's a bit like me saying we
should all write in French because it's so much easier to read due to its
obvious meaning.
Stefan
Re: Request to add tomelr package to GNU ELPA, tomas, 2022/05/03
Re: Request to add tomelr package to GNU ELPA, João Pedro, 2022/05/03