emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CC Mode with font-lock-maximum-decoration 2


From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: CC Mode with font-lock-maximum-decoration 2
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 14:57:25 +0300

> Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 11:24:20 +0000
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> From: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
> 
> Hello, Eli.
> 
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 14:07:33 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 08:00:16 +0000
> > > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> > > From: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
> 
> > > > > > Then what is the importance of these measurements of yours?
> 
> > > > > They show that an attempt to speed up CC Mode/2 should be 
> > > > > concentrating
> > > > > on the code which isn't fontification code.
> 
> > > > Please elaborate on this conclusion, because I don't think I
> > > > understand how you arrived at it, based on your measurements.  With
> > > > the default value of font-lock-maximum-decoration, the fontifications
> > > > are also very slow, relatively to other modes.
> 
> > > I mean CC Mode with font-lock-maximum-decoration = 2, particularly.  The
> > > fontification in this setup is not slow (72% of Emacs Lisp Mode's
> > > speed).  The setup as a whole is not fast enough.  Therefore to speed it
> > > up, fontification is not the aspect to concentrate on.
> 
> > But if we will never recommend using level 2, those conclusions are
> > again of no practical value for our users.  Right?
> 
> I don't agree.  If there is some place in our documentation to do it,
> then we should recommend level 2 for those, like you, who want rapid
> response, and level 3 for those, like me, who want accurate
> fontification.  It's a simple (or complicated) user choice.

We are not talking about my personal customizations, we are talking
about what CC Mode does by default.  If we'd changed the default to be
level 2 for CC Mode, I could understand your line of reasoning.  But
since you don't think this should be the default, I say what CC Mode
does at level 2 is not of practical importance for making CC Mode fast
enough.

> You have stated that CC Mode with level 2 is not fast enough.  I intend
> to make this (what I call CC Mode/2) faster.

That factoid doesn't do anything for making CC Mode faster for our
users, even if you assume that I personally will use that level.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]