|
From: | Po Lu |
Subject: | Re: Why tree-sitter instead of Semantic? (was Re: CC Mode with font-lock-maximum-decoration 2) |
Date: | Wed, 10 Aug 2022 10:14:58 +0800 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.91 (gnu/linux) |
Lynn Winebarger <owinebar@gmail.com> writes: > I'm curious, though, as to why Semantic/CEDET seems to have been > superceded by external solutions like tree-sitter or LSP-based > (non-emacs) servers. One of the draws of Emacs for me is the > "batteries included" nature of it having Emacs Lisp built in. Is > there a downside to using Semantic as the basis for improving my > derived mode that's non-obvious? I think Semantic lost intertia after the original author lost interest in it (or left for unrelated reasons, I don't remember which.)
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |