[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ideal performance of ELisp
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
Re: Ideal performance of ELisp |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Aug 2022 17:48:44 +0800 |
Andrea Corallo <akrl@sdf.org> writes:
>>> Yep that's an option, I thought about that as well, not sure how much
>>> practical it is tho. One of the downside is that we could not consume
>>> nor provide any of the existing C header files.
>>
>> Do I understand correctly that a certain pre-defined set of C headers
>> can still be included?
>
> Where do you undersand that from? libgccjit does *not* consume nor
> compile C code as input, header files are just that.
An example in https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/jit/intro/tutorial01.html
is using functions from stdio.
I did not refer to C code verbatim but rather to whatever is the
function used to translate Elisp "C" macro into libgccjit code. Such
macro may refer to C primitives that are included in the file definition
the libgccjit C wrapper.
--
Ihor Radchenko,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at https://orgmode.org/.
Support Org development at https://liberapay.com/org-mode,
or support my work at https://liberapay.com/yantar92
- Re: Ideal performance of ELisp, (continued)
- Re: Ideal performance of ELisp, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/08/13
- Re: Ideal performance of ELisp, Stefan Monnier, 2022/08/13
- Re: Ideal performance of ELisp, Andrea Corallo, 2022/08/14
- Re: Ideal performance of ELisp, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/08/14
- Re: Ideal performance of ELisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/08/14
- Re: Ideal performance of ELisp, Andrea Corallo, 2022/08/16
- Re: Ideal performance of ELisp, Stefan Monnier, 2022/08/14
- Re: Ideal performance of ELisp, Andrea Corallo, 2022/08/16
- Re: Ideal performance of ELisp, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/08/16
- Re: Ideal performance of ELisp, Andrea Corallo, 2022/08/16
- Re: Ideal performance of ELisp,
Ihor Radchenko <=
- Re: Ideal performance of ELisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/08/17
- Re: Ideal performance of ELisp, Lynn Winebarger, 2022/08/16
- Re: Ideal performance of ELisp, Andrea Corallo, 2022/08/16
- Re: Ideal performance of ELisp, Lynn Winebarger, 2022/08/17
- Re: Ideal performance of ELisp, Andrea Corallo, 2022/08/17
- Re: Ideal performance of ELisp, Lynn Winebarger, 2022/08/18
- Re: Why tree-sitter instead of Semantic? (was Re: CC Mode with font-lock-maximum-decoration 2), Akib Azmain Turja, 2022/08/12
- Re: Why tree-sitter instead of Semantic? (was Re: CC Mode with font-lock-maximum-decoration 2), tomas, 2022/08/12
- Re: Why tree-sitter instead of Semantic? (was Re: CC Mode with font-lock-maximum-decoration 2), Akib Azmain Turja, 2022/08/13
- Re: Why tree-sitter instead of Semantic? (was Re: CC Mode with font-lock-maximum-decoration 2), tomas, 2022/08/13