[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: wrap-search 3.3.5
From: |
Philip Kaludercic |
Subject: |
Re: wrap-search 3.3.5 |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Aug 2022 19:05:04 +0000 |
Emanuel Berg <incal@dataswamp.org> writes:
>
> Philip Kaludercic wrote:
>
>> Could you elaborate what you meant to say with this message.
>> Should it be added to ELPA?
>
> Sure!
Do you have a git repository?
>> Btw. the commentary section should start after the
>> header section.
>
> Okay, note that `checkdoc' don't say that, nor does the
> byte-compiler ...
>From what I believe, it would only matter if the header is parsed, which
is not what checkdoc ensures, let alone the byte-compiler. The only
thing that I see it breaks is that `lm-commentary' returns the headers,
which would look bad in describe-package.
> But thanks, you mean like this?
Yes.
- wrap-search 3.3.5, Emanuel Berg, 2022/08/25
- Re: wrap-search 3.3.5, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/08/25
- Re: wrap-search 3.3.5, Emanuel Berg, 2022/08/25
- Re: wrap-search 3.3.5,
Philip Kaludercic <=
- Re: wrap-search 3.3.5, Emanuel Berg, 2022/08/25
- Re: wrap-search 3.3.5, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/08/25
- Re: wrap-search 3.3.5, Emanuel Berg, 2022/08/26
- Re: wrap-search 3.3.5, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/08/26
- Re: wrap-search 3.3.5, Emanuel Berg, 2022/08/26
- Re: wrap-search 3.3.5, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/08/27
- Re: wrap-search 3.3.5, Emanuel Berg, 2022/08/27
- Re: wrap-search 3.3.5, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/08/28
- Re: wrap-search 3.3.5, Andreas Schwab, 2022/08/28
- Re: wrap-search 3.3.5, Emanuel Berg, 2022/08/28