|
| From: | Jim Porter |
| Subject: | Re: esh-proc test failures |
| Date: | Mon, 29 Aug 2022 20:18:36 -0700 |
On 8/23/2022 9:38 AM, Jim Porter wrote:
Then I think we're in agreement, since that's what Eshell currently does. (My sentence above was just trying to say that, *somehow*, Eshell needs to be sure that the relevant process is informed of the error. Delivering a signal is how Eshell does it now, and I think that's ok.)
Merged as f9250c5ebc1730bf3bed4382549433f52f7ef9ca. Hopefully this fixes EMBA; if there are any further issues anyone encounters, just let me know.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |