|
From: | समीर सिंह Sameer Singh |
Subject: | Re: Supporting stylistic sets |
Date: | Sat, 24 Sep 2022 13:30:00 +0530 |
You are thinking about one particular use case. There might be
others.
Btw, is it always the case that, when using a particular font, users
will want to apply the same stylistic-set feature to all of the
characters from the font that have alternative glyphs? If not, then
font-level feature sets are not going to solve that, and we will need
to be able to specify this for each character individually.
> From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh <lumarzeli30@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2022 10:13:47 +0530
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
>
> That means all text that uses the font will use that stylistic-set.
> Is that good enough? What if you want to have the same font with and
> without a specific stylistic-set in the same document?.
>
> Isn't the point of stylistic-set is that if you don't like a particular glyph of a font you can interchange it for
> another, therefore I don't
> see why someone would have the same font with and without the stylistic-set in the same document.
You are thinking about one particular use case. There might be
others.
> For example: Tiro Bangla had set the stylistic set because the users could not agree how the হ্+ন and হ্+ণ
> conjuncts should look[1].
> It is the case for FiraCode too, simple variations of glyphs which the user can switch out according to their
> preference.
If we want to support the use case of "just change the appearance of a
particular character", then a much simpler implementation would be to
use the existing character-composition machinery. Specifically:
. add a suitable entry to composition-function-table, with a regexp
that matches the characters you want to affect
. provide a new variable that can be used to specify which, if any,
stylistic feature to use for each character (this could be a
char-table, for example)
. modify hbfont_shape to consult the above variable and apply the
requested features to the affected character(s)
Btw, is it always the case that, when using a particular font, users
will want to apply the same stylistic-set feature to all of the
characters from the font that have alternative glyphs? If not, then
font-level feature sets are not going to solve that, and we will need
to be able to specify this for each character individually.
> And if the font is not the default face's font, it means you need to
> setup a special face for using it anyway.
>
> You mean for scripts like Bangla, Devanagari etc?
> For them defining their font-spec wouldn't work?
I meant that the way to use a special font in Emacs, for ASCII
characters, is to define a special face that uses that font.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |