[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Renaming eglot -- or at least add an alias?
From: |
Po Lu |
Subject: |
Re: Renaming eglot -- or at least add an alias? |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Sep 2022 18:31:23 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.91 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi all, João,
>
> Now that we're getting closer to merging eglot, I think it is our last
> chance to (re-)consider that "eglot" is not the ideal name. It has some
> charm, of course, but it is quite non-descriptive and it's hard (read:
> impossible) to understand what it does based on the name alone.[1]
>
> As for names, lsp-mode would be the obvious choice, but some other
> package has occupied that prefix (too bad). I therefore propose
> renaming it to elsp-mode and using the elsp-* prefix for it.
>
> At the very least, we should consider adding some alias, like
> `start-lsp', and/or `lsp-start'.[2]
>
> Footnotes:
> [1] https://lists.gnu.org/r/emacs-devel/2020-05/msg02828.html
>
> [2] https://lists.gnu.org/r/emacs-devel/2020-05/msg02818.html
I think I've said this before as well. That would be a great idea.
What about language-server-mode, though, as `elsp' is still not very
descriptive?
However, the more pressing problem is that (as I've said) searching for
"language server" in Customize does not reveal much of value.
Re: Renaming eglot -- or at least add an alias?, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/09/30
Re: Renaming eglot -- or at least add an alias?,
Po Lu <=
Re: Renaming eglot -- or at least add an alias?, João Távora, 2022/09/30
Re: Renaming eglot -- or at least add an alias?, Daniel Martín, 2022/09/30
Re: Renaming eglot -- or at least add an alias?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/09/30