[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] org-review-schedule
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: [O] org-review-schedule |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Apr 2014 13:51:15 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) |
Alan Schmitt <address@hidden> writes:
>> - maybe you can use "naked" timestamps like 2014-04-19 sam.
>> instead of inactive ones, this way using "[" in the agenda
>> will not create false positives by inserting entries with
>> a REVIEW property.
>
> OK. I'm not sure what "[" is supposed to do in the agenda, and I don't
> see how it could interfere.
It includes headlines with an inactive timestamp in the agenda.
So if you have a property :REVIEW_DELAY: [Inactive timestamp] this
headline will be show in the agenda if the timestamp matches.
> (I like inactive time stamps because I can
> easily adjust their dates with C-left and C-right, is it possible to do
> so with naked timestamps?)
Well... no. Of course you can simply use inactive timestamps and
advice users not to include them in the agenda.
> Yes. But I should think about it more to see where I could take
> this.
Thanks in advance!
--
Bastien
- [O] org-review-schedule, Alan Schmitt, 2014/04/18
- Re: [O] org-review-schedule, Bastien, 2014/04/19
- Re: [O] org-review-schedule, Alan Schmitt, 2014/04/19
- Re: [O] org-review-schedule,
Bastien <=
- Re: [O] org-review-schedule, Alan Schmitt, 2014/04/25
- Re: [O] org-review-schedule, Nicolas Goaziou, 2014/04/25
- Re: [O] org-review-schedule, Alan Schmitt, 2014/04/25
- Re: [O] org-review-schedule, Nicolas Goaziou, 2014/04/25
- Re: [O] org-review-schedule, Alan Schmitt, 2014/04/27
- Re: [O] org-review-schedule, AW, 2014/04/28
- Re: [O] org-review-schedule, Alan Schmitt, 2014/04/28
- Re: [O] org-review-schedule, Alan Schmitt, 2014/04/26
- Re: [O] org-review-schedule, Thorsten Jolitz, 2014/04/26
- Re: [O] org-review-schedule, Nicolas Goaziou, 2014/04/26