Re: [Fenfire-dev] PEG swamp_easier--benja: An easier API for Swamp

[Benja Fallenstein]

Tuomas Lukka wrote:
> > > > Jena returns just an arbitrary one of the matching triples in a similar 
> > > > situation; I'm leaning towards that.
> > >
> > > I'd *really* hate that one -- I'd prefer swamp to have totally clear
> > > semantics, with the only arbitrary thing being the order in which a set
> > > is iterated through. 
> >
> > Hmm. Any ideas, then? Maybe remove ``getObject()`` etc.?
>
> Still throw an error, I think. Since the error has the info on what
> tuple wasn't unique, there's a good opportunity to fix the problem.

Will *anybody* write correct code for handling this in the case that the 
two triples (or more) are equivalent? I.e., just do what would be done 
if any of the three triples were there individually, and get on? How 
would a code example of this work?

Can you provide a code example using this?

- Benja