[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gforth] Strange behavior of f! etc.
From: |
Charles G Montgomery |
Subject: |
Re: [gforth] Strange behavior of f! etc. |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:57:06 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.1.0-1-amd64; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) |
On Sunday 12 February 2012 6:22:20 PM Marcel Hendrix wrote:
> What has changed? It appears something is wrong with array indexing.
> However, the official Gforth files from the FSL
> (http://www.taygeta.com/fsl/scilib.html) are used?
> X-Online-Scanned: by Cloudmark authority (on smtp09.online.nl)
>
> I have append all three files under question.
>
> Sequences of pi xx{ 1 } f! xx{ 1 } f@ f. seem to work.
> Putting it inside a do loop in a definition fails as shown.
>
> -marcel
> ....
This doesn't seem to happen with just gforth rather than gforth-fast.
(Debian Version: 0.7.0+ds1-6 )
I see David Kuehling <address@hidden> finds this too.
BTW, the name of the official FSL file is walsh.fth rather than
walsh.fs. I think only the name of the file is different.
regards cgm
- [gforth] Strange behavior of f! etc., Marcel Hendrix, 2012/02/12
- Re: [gforth] Strange behavior of f! etc., David Kuehling, 2012/02/12
- Re: [gforth] Strange behavior of f! etc.,
Charles G Montgomery <=
- Re: [gforth] Strange behavior of f! etc., David Kuehling, 2012/02/12
- Re: [gforth] Strange behavior of f! etc., Dennis Ruffer, 2012/02/12
- Re: [gforth] Strange behavior of f! etc., David Kuehling, 2012/02/13
- Re: [gforth] Strange behavior of f! etc., Dennis Ruffer, 2012/02/13
- Re: [gforth] Strange behavior of f! etc., Anton Ertl, 2012/02/13
- Re: [gforth] Strange behavior of f! etc., Dennis Ruffer, 2012/02/13
- Re: [gforth] Strange behavior of f! etc., Charles G Montgomery, 2012/02/12
- Re: [gforth] Strange behavior of f! etc., Charles G Montgomery, 2012/02/13
- Re: [gforth] Strange behavior of f! etc., Elko Tchernev, 2012/02/13