[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gforth] Strange behavior of f! etc.
From: |
Dennis Ruffer |
Subject: |
Re: [gforth] Strange behavior of f! etc. |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:08:20 -0800 |
I've been having trouble compiling the TOT on cygwin for quite some time and
haven't had time to even complain.
Presently, I get this error:
make[3]: *** No rule to make target `arch/lm32/asm.fs', needed by
`gforth.fi'.
So, I can't help. ;(
DaR
-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of David
Kuehling
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 5:11 PM
To: Charles G Montgomery
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [gforth] Strange behavior of f! etc.
>>>>> "Charles" == Charles G Montgomery <address@hidden> writes:
> On Sunday 12 February 2012 6:22:20 PM Marcel Hendrix wrote:
>> What has changed? It appears something is wrong with array indexing.
>> However, the official Gforth files from the FSL
>> (http://www.taygeta.com/fsl/scilib.html) are used? X-Online-Scanned:
>> by Cloudmark authority (on smtp09.online.nl)
>>
>> I have append all three files under question.
>>
>> Sequences of pi xx{ 1 } f! xx{ 1 } f@ f. seem to work. Putting it
>> inside a do loop in a definition fails as shown.
>>
>> -marcel ....
> This doesn't seem to happen with just gforth rather than gforth-fast.
> (Debian Version: 0.7.0+ds1-6 ) I see David Kuehling <address@hidden>
> finds this too.
Do you say you can reproduce the bug report on debian i386 with gforth-fast?
For me the bug doesn't happen at all, neither with gforth-fast nor gforth.
But then I didn't try a i386 version of gforth (only amd64 and 32-bit
mipsel).
cheers,
David
--
GnuPG public key: http://dvdkhlng.users.sourceforge.net/dk.gpg
Fingerprint: B17A DC95 D293 657B 4205 D016 7DEF 5323 C174 7D40