gforth
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

(n)T (as in 'type') re Fwd: Gforth Digest, Vol 93, Issue 2


From: JWM
Subject: (n)T (as in 'type') re Fwd: Gforth Digest, Vol 93, Issue 2
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 18:34:41 -0700

Thanks Ethan.  I use polyFORTH (now sF) and always in 
   “REQUIRES BLOCKEDIT” mode.  So now I’ll not get 
   upset unless I forget about this note on “T”.
- Jay Melvin

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: gforth-request@gnu.org
> Subject: Gforth Digest, Vol 93, Issue 2
> Date: July 11, 2020 at 9:00:11 AM PDT
> To: gforth@gnu.org
> Reply-To: gforth@gnu.org
> 
> Send Gforth mailing list submissions to
>       gforth@gnu.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>       https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gforth
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>       gforth-request@gnu.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>       gforth-owner@gnu.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Gforth digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Re: Bug report (Ethan Gardener)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 20:30:07 +0100
> From: "Ethan Gardener" <eekee57@fastmail.fm>
> To: "Bernd Paysan via Gforth" <gforth@gnu.org>
> Subject: Re: Bug report
> Message-ID: <56d89148-a345-483a-9f69-5f5aa512d00a@www.fastmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
>>> Type a single letter t or T followed by return
>>> 
>>> Gforth freezes
>> 
>> No, it waits for a TCP connection on port 4444.
> 
> If this is the first mention of this, it's obvious no-one but me uses 
> blocked. ;) T in blocked selects a line and inserts text. The trouble is it's 
> part of the editor vocabulary, and I sometimes found the order unexpectedly 
> reset to only forth. It doesn't affect me any more because I made my own 
> commands for blocked, replacing t in particular, but just thought I'd mention 
> the issue. I can understand only wanting to type a single letter on an 
> onscreen keyboard to switch the input somewhere else, but I can't help 
> thinking something a little longer would be more appropriate and less likely 
> to conflict, perhaps tel .
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Digest Footer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gforth mailing list
> Gforth@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gforth
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> End of Gforth Digest, Vol 93, Issue 2
> *************************************



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]