[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 3110 statemachine handling (patch)
From: |
BORBELY Zoltan |
Subject: |
Re: 3110 statemachine handling (patch) |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Feb 2003 23:08:30 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 01:55:58PM +0200, Osma Suominen wrote:
> 1.1. if yes, do you want to resend what you just sent in case no
> reply comes in before timeout?
Maybe we should move it into the link layer, but I think it will be a
big patch (this is the reason why I implemented it in the statemachine
recently). I see no reason not to retransmit unacknowledged frames. I
think this move should be an after 0.5.0 thing, this devel cycle gets
longer and longer.
Bye,
Bozo
- 3110 statemachine handling (patch), Osma Suominen, 2003/02/17
- Re: 3110 statemachine handling (patch), Pawel Kot, 2003/02/17
- Re: 3110 statemachine handling (patch), Osma Suominen, 2003/02/18
- Re: 3110 statemachine handling (patch), Ruotger . Skupin, 2003/02/18
- Re: 3110 statemachine handling (patch), Ladislav Michl, 2003/02/24
- Re: 3110 statemachine handling (patch),
BORBELY Zoltan <=
- Re: 3110 statemachine handling (patch), Pawel Kot, 2003/02/24
- Re: 3110 statemachine handling (patch), BORBELY Zoltan, 2003/02/24
- Re: 3110 statemachine handling (patch), Osma Suominen, 2003/02/25
- Re: 3110 statemachine handling (patch), Christopher Kemp, 2003/02/25
- Re: 3110 statemachine handling (NEW patch), Osma Suominen, 2003/02/25
- Re: 3110 statemachine handling (patch), Ladislav Michl, 2003/02/25