[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] preparing to stress test tla with linux-2.5
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] preparing to stress test tla with linux-2.5 |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Aug 2003 16:36:29 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 03:24:09PM -0700, Tom Lord wrote:
> > And to the list of people to whom I should, in some sense, be
advocating
> > breaking the kernel up into a multi-project config.
> Hmmm, while I appreciate that often its nice to compose source trees from
> multiple sources, I currently think of configs as an `extra layer of
> annoyance' and since I'm quite used to treating the kernel as as a single
big
> tree, cringe a bit at having to use configs for it.
With respect, that you think of the kernel as a single big tree makes
me glad I don't use that kernel.
> No doubt this is partly my ignorance about configs (really I have only
used
> them to get Tom's source tree for tla set up).
Yeah, configs are cool. You'll get into them eventually.
> I guess my main beef is the way they seem to interfere with the nice
`single
> command operates on/produces a single tree' property of arch/tla, and
that I
> to stop and think about the fact that `OH, in _this_ tree (or part of a
tree)
> I have to use special commands because it uses configs.'
Sure, but I think that strongly correlates with a good software architecture.
> In the case of the kernel, there are natural boundaries for organizational
> splits -- e.g., the various arch/ subdirs -- but existing development
styles
> definitely treat it all as `one big tree', and it's not uncommon for
single
> changes to pervasively affect the whole tree, regardless of organizational
> boundaries.
Sounds mostly like a meta-bug in the kernel.
> So, I'm not sure what my real point is other than (1) configs currently
seem
> annoyingly clunky, and (2) it's not clear that in their current form they
> really fit with existing kernel development style.
I agree with (2) and about (1) -- there's plenty of room to beef up
the arch command set to maximize the convenience of configs in arch.
-t
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] preparing to stress test tla with linux-2.5, Tupshin Harper, 2003/08/25
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: preparing to stress test tla with linux-2.5, John Goerzen, 2003/08/28