Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging

[Andrew Suffield]

On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 01:15:25PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> On 2003-08-23 04:58:04 +0100 Jonathan Walther <address@hidden> 
> wrote:
> >Balogna.  'L' (list-reply-only) in mutt took one look at your message,
> >which contained all the List-* headers, and it said "No list found!"
> >Why are we expected to use bullshit software like this?
> 
> I've no idea.  mutt is another email client which has no List-* 
> handling.  Given that I thought some hackers used mutt, I was 
> surprised to discover that.  Maybe it says something about mutt users 
> who pontificate about email standards, yet don't help to implement 
> them, or about how much fun it is to hack on mutt?

When you have M-F-T, List-* is a very poor substitute.

And even without it, a little muttrc magic means that mutt doesn't
_need_ List-* headers.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

pgpoqjTWRFnMu.pgp
Description: PGP signature