gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging


From: Andrew Suffield
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 10:22:04 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 06:11:29PM -0700, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 11:47:45PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> >When you have M-F-T, List-* is a very poor substitute.
> >
> >And even without it, a little muttrc magic means that mutt doesn't
> >_need_ List-* headers.
> 
> I should not have to edit .muttrc for every single mailing list I reply
> to, especially when the List-* headers are very informative.  Anything
> that makes me do unnecessary work is broken and wrong.

How do you tell, from the List-* headers, whether or not you are
subscribed to the mailing list?

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: pgpIJ0pUmgORP.pgp
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]