Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: today's merges

[Andrew Suffield]

On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 08:34:09PM +0200, Karel Gardas wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Robert Anderson wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 13:48, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > > I'm not going with 1.1 just yet because the 1.1pre releases tend to
> > > have a fair few bugs, and I don't have time to sift all the patches
> > > applying those which fix signficant issues. 1.0 is limited, but
> > > _works_, and to the best of my knowledge has no significant issues in
> > > the latest Debian release.
> >
> > I would consider "no star-merge" a significant issue.
> >
> 
> Indeed! For our MICO project development no star-merge is simply
> show-stopper. Is really 1.1 so unstable or buggy?

Not buggy, per se, just unstable in the classic sense of the word -
it's a target that moves _really_ fast. I don't have time to chase
it. You're better off running from the daily builds if you need that
sort of stuff.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

pgpsgzfpIQxov.pgp
Description: PGP signature