Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit

[Davide Libenzi]

On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Tom Lord wrote:

> Nope.  LM took exactly one right step -- and that was working on
> giving linus some semblance of revctl religion.   The details of bk
> that pertain to that are not the central details of bk.
>
>     > It's hard to believe that suddendly a huge number
>     > of pretty smart engineers in lkml decided to go with BK.
>
> Why, exactly?   Do you think there was a systematic and careful
> evaluation of the issues by these people?

(I'm playing BK advocate, and I don't like it ...)
Honestly, do you think that with the current status of Arch, you can go to
Linus and have him/them work with the same/higher level of features that
he's currently working on BK? And look, this is really a question because
I have no idea.



- Davide