[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Planned move to Arch (cygwin issue) ...
|
From: |
Robert Collins |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Planned move to Arch (cygwin issue) ... |
|
Date: |
Mon, 06 Oct 2003 17:43:55 +1000 |
On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 12:59, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> Is it a Cygwin limitation? Don't they use the "\\?\" prefix for paths,
> that enable them to go up to 32000 chars?
\\?\ doesn't give you 32K path lengths, using functionW call variants
does. And it's in the archives here...
Rob
--
GPG key available at: <http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Planned move to Arch (cygwin issue) ..., (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Planned move to Arch (cygwin issue) ..., Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/10/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Planned move to Arch (cygwin issue) ..., Robert Collins, 2003/10/07
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Planned move to Arch (cygwin issue) ..., Miles Bader, 2003/10/07
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Planned move to Arch (cygwin issue) ..., Robert Collins, 2003/10/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Planned move to Arch (cygwin issue) ..., John Kinson, 2003/10/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Planned move to Arch (cygwin issue) ..., Robert Collins, 2003/10/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Planned move to Arch (cygwin issue) ...,
Robert Collins <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Planned move to Arch (cygwin issue) ..., Davide Libenzi, 2003/10/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Planned move to Arch (cygwin issue) ..., Robert Collins, 2003/10/06