Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Extension language

[Colin Walters]

On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 00:35, Miles Bader wrote:

> I'm not sure what you're saying, but ... yeah.  My point was that they
> become significantly more of a pain if you've got to pass them across a
> pipe and parse them &c.  

Yes.  Obviously we need to fix libarch so that it wouldn't require
talking across some pipe to implement an extension language.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part