[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2 |
Date: |
17 Oct 2003 19:08:39 +0900 |
Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
> > Well, let me mention Lua on this one.
>
> Hmmm, never saw that one before. It looks very nice -- they seemed to
> have well resisted the usual temptation to get all wacky...
... and BTW, I think it strongly resembles awk, which (as some of you
may have noticed :-) I'm a big fan of.
-Miles
--
`...the Soviet Union was sliding in to an economic collapse so comprehensive
that in the end its factories produced not goods but bads: finished products
less valuable than the raw materials they were made from.' [The Economist]
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Java and arch, (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Nit, Björn Lindström, 2003/10/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Colin Walters, 2003/10/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Nit, Karel Gardas, 2003/10/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Extension language, Charles Duffy, 2003/10/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Extension language, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/10/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-pqm 0.2, Samium Gromoff, 2003/10/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2, Miles Bader, 2003/10/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2, Paul Hedderly, 2003/10/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2, Samium Gromoff, 2003/10/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2, Tom Lord, 2003/10/17
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-pqm 0.2, Thomas Zander, 2003/10/17
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-pqm 0.2, Florian Weimer, 2003/10/17