[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-pqm 0.2
From: |
Colin Walters |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-pqm 0.2 |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Oct 2003 10:28:09 -0400 |
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 05:55, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Colin Walters wrote:
>
> > Comments, questions, etc appreciated!
>
> I'd like to have something which actually is a _patch_ queue, not just a
> _merge_ _request_ queue.
Hmm. So you would basically have to do the star-merge on the client
side, and then tar up that changeset and send it? Perhaps if we
automated the client-side star-merge (pretty easy), the whole operation
might not be too painful.
I will think about it more.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-pqm 0.2, Thomas Zander, 2003/10/17
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-pqm 0.2, Florian Weimer, 2003/10/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-pqm 0.2,
Colin Walters <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-pqm 0.2, Florian Weimer, 2003/10/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-pqm 0.2, Tom Lord, 2003/10/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-pqm 0.2, Joshua Haberman, 2003/10/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-pqm 0.2, Colin Walters, 2003/10/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-pqm 0.2, Joshua Haberman, 2003/10/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-pqm 0.2, Colin Walters, 2003/10/18