[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Hierarchical SCM and CVS vs SVN vs arch (was Re: in
From: |
Andrew Suffield |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Hierarchical SCM and CVS vs SVN vs arch (was Re: in-tree pristines fatally ...) |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Dec 2003 13:07:09 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 09:13:44AM +0000, Misha Dorman wrote:
> Could you both elaborate, for the record, as much as anything:
> Mistaken that SVN has such an ability?
> Mistaken CVS lacks it? [does cvs get -p abc.c > abc.c count as "easy
> ability"?]
> Mistaken that arch lacks it? [tla file-find is the get -p equivalent, IIRC]
> Or a combination of the above?
>
> Has (Momchil's? Dustin's?) tla revert been added to tla1.1?
>
> What are the advantages/disadvantages of tla revert compared with tla
> file-find abc.c > abc.c (apart from obvious [script-fixable] usability
> issues like having to give the filename twice)? (e.g. performance and
> applicability, both in presence/absence of revlibs/pristines, for both
> "revert to checked out" and "revert to arbitrary prior version").
The appropriate form would be tla file-diffs foo.c | patch -R
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature