gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] pending merges


From: Tom Lord
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] pending merges
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 19:11:41 -0800 (PST)

    > From: Robert Collins <address@hidden>

    > Tom,
    >   there are a few pending merges in
    > address@hidden/tla--integration--1.1

Done.

    > address@hidden/package-framework--integration--1.0

Done.    


    > address@hidden/hackerlab--integration--1.0

Rejected.   That patch adds a declaration for rename to file
containing the single call to rename in libhackerlab.

As an (admittedly minor and somewhat, these days, theoretical)
portability issue, it is important not to add declarations for system
calls --- they may have a non-standard prototype and be declared in
some header that is included, resulting in a "conflicting declarations
issue".

As an (admittedly anal-retentive and paranoid) coding standard for
libhackerlab, no libhackerlab file may include <stdio.h> (in which
rename is officially declared).


So, we just live with that one warning.

What's the deal with tla--gpg--1.1?  Can I go ahead and merge that to
work on .sig generation?

-t





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]