[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead? |
Date: |
16 Dec 2003 08:55:46 +0900 |
Florian Weimer <address@hidden> writes:
> Result: Pristine tree is created, revision library is still empty.
> Is this the expected behavior?
I think it will only use the library automatically if it's marked
`greedy', so do something like:
tla library-config --greedy ~/revisions
[you could also specify the --sparse flag if you want that]
-Miles
--
Saa, shall we dance? (from a dance-class advertisement)
- [Gnu-arch-users] Are pristine trees really dead?, Florian Weimer, 2003/12/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Florian Weimer, 2003/12/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Miles Bader, 2003/12/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Benjamin Bytheway, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Robin Farine, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Miles Bader, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Florian Weimer, 2003/12/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/12/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Florian Weimer, 2003/12/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/17