[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?
From: |
Robin Farine |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead? |
Date: |
17 Dec 2003 10:04:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
>>>>> Benjamin Bytheway writes:
> I've replicated the steps, and it doesn't work for me. I end up with
> an empty revlib.
If you do a normal 'get', it will not populate the library since 'get'
does not need anything from it. Instead, try 'get --link'.
Robin
- [Gnu-arch-users] Are pristine trees really dead?, Florian Weimer, 2003/12/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Miles Bader, 2003/12/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Florian Weimer, 2003/12/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Miles Bader, 2003/12/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Benjamin Bytheway, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?,
Robin Farine <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Miles Bader, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Florian Weimer, 2003/12/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/12/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Florian Weimer, 2003/12/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Florian Weimer, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Jan Hudec, 2003/12/18