|
From: | Dustin Sallings |
Subject: | Re: [Gnu-arch-users] oh the heck with it -- tla-1.2pre0 |
Date: | Tue, 30 Dec 2003 22:31:40 -0800 |
On Dec 30, 2003, at 22:43, Tom Lord wrote:
I do, of course, realize how much more simple it is to add signature support than changeset encryption.That's odd since encryption is simpler to implement.
Oh, well then...scratch that assumption. Good to hear, though. I list flexibility as one of the selling points for arch whenever I get in those discussions.
I think it's a good idea and I could put it to immediate use. I wouldn't, however, list it as the most important missing feature for me.
-- SPY My girlfriend asked me which one I like better. pub 1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <address@hidden> | Key fingerprint = 87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6 C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE L_______________________ I hope the answer won't upset her. ____________
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |