[Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch params

[James Blackwell]

On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 06:08:24PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> James Blackwell <address@hidden> writes:
> > Thus, I am of the opinion that tla should remain silent when good
> > signatures are encountered (traditionally, tools should remain silent
> > unless there is a problem).
> 
> Me too, but is there actually a way to make gpg shut up about them?
> The --quiet flag doesn't have any effect in that case, and redirecting
> stderr for gpg seems like a not-very-good idea...

Off the hip here, but couldn't we take over stderr and silently squash the
result if we either A) Get a return code of 0 or B) are able to find "Good
Signature" in the output ? 


> It would be nice if gpg had a `say nothing unless something's really
> wrong' mode (and presumably tla only cares about the exit status anyway).

Yeah. It might be better to send a patch upstream with an explanation of
why we want this.

-- 
James Blackwell      Using I.T. to bring more             570-407-0488
Owner, Inframix      business to your business     http://inframix.com

GnuPG (ID 06357400) AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D  247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature