Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch params

[Colin Walters]

On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 04:08, Miles Bader wrote:
> James Blackwell <address@hidden> writes:
> > Thus, I am of the opinion that tla should remain silent when good
> > signatures are encountered (traditionally, tools should remain silent
> > unless there is a problem).
> 
> Me too, but is there actually a way to make gpg shut up about them?

I don't think so, unfortunately.  But I am using this workaround script
now as my =default.check:

#!/bin/sh

tmp=$(mktemp ~/tmp/tla-gpgoutputXXXXXX)
if ! gpg --batch --verify 1>"$tmp" 2>&1; then
  cat "$tmp"
  exit 1
fi
rm -f "$tmp"

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part