[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] extended attributes
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] extended attributes |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 13:04:23 -0800 (PST) |
> From: Thomas Zander <address@hidden>
> Anyway; Since ACLs are OK, will they be revision-managed by tla?
Since, unlike permission bits, they are not portable between
environments -- it is not a priority.
On the other hand, since they are sets, hence diffing and patching
them is easy to define, should someone want to do or sponsor the work,
there is no insurmountable obstacle to supporting them.
-t
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] extended attributes, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] extended attributes, Andrew Suffield, 2004/01/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] extended attributes, Tom Lord, 2004/01/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] extended attributes, Andrew Suffield, 2004/01/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] extended attributes, Thomas Zander, 2004/01/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] extended attributes, Tom Lord, 2004/01/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] extended attributes, Florian Weimer, 2004/01/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] extended attributes, Tom Lord, 2004/01/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] extended attributes, zander, 2004/01/06
- Message not available
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] extended attributes,
Tom Lord <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] extended attributes, Tom Lord, 2004/01/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] extended attributes, Colin Walters, 2004/01/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] extended attributes, Tom Lord, 2004/01/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] extended attributes, Chris Mason, 2004/01/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] extended attributes, Andrew Suffield, 2004/01/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] extended attributes, Chris Mason, 2004/01/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] extended attributes, Tom Lord, 2004/01/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] extended attributes, Chris Mason, 2004/01/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] extended attributes, Aaron Bentley, 2004/01/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] extended attributes, Chris Mason, 2004/01/07