[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Bug! (Was: Bug? Patchlogs "lacking inventory ids".)
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Bug! (Was: Bug? Patchlogs "lacking inventory ids".) |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:18:04 -0800 (PST) |
> From: Jan Hudec <address@hidden>
> > I have built a branch of an old archive, replaced tag: with arch-tag:
> > everywhere and changed implicit tagging method with tagline. And started
> > to get this:
> > address@hidden:~/dev/ucw-scheme-library$ tla tree-lint
> > These apparent source files lack inventory ids:
> >
{arch}/ucw-scheme-library/ucw-scheme-library--mainline/ucw-scheme-library--mainline--0.1/address@hidden
> >
{arch}/ucw-scheme-library/ucw-scheme-library--mainline/ucw-scheme-library--mainline--0.1/address@hidden/patch-log
> >
{arch}/ucw-scheme-library/ucw-scheme-library--mainline/ucw-scheme-library--mainline--0.1/address@hidden/patch-log/base-0
> >
{arch}/ucw-scheme-library/ucw-scheme-library--mainline/ucw-scheme-library--mainline--0.1/address@hidden/patch-log/patch-1
> > (address@hidden/ucw-scheme-library--mainline--0.1 is
> > the tagged revision, current tree version is
> > address@hidden/ucw-scheme-library--main--0.2)
> > Can this be result of changing tagging method from implicit to tagline
> > and if so, how can it be fixed?
> Yes, it's definitely a bug! It does not work because of the '0'
> character in the e-mail address! But it's a perfectly valud e-mail
> address.
I believe that the (soon to pushed) patch-57 will fix this particular
case. There may be some other instances of valid archive names
that don't pass the control-file regexp -- but this one should work
with that patch.
-t