Re: [Gnu-arch-users] fedora core 2 will include subversion (and not gnu arch)

[A.J. Rossini]

Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:

> On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 08:56:45PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> A.J. Rossini wrote:
>> > Without seeing exactly how this is accomplished, it had better be MUCH
>> > better than Debian's packaging of subversion, which is still a pain in
>> > the royal arse to get running.  
>> 
>> This doesn't match my experience.
>
> Are you talking about the same thing?  When I read A.J. Rossini's message I
> assumed he was referring to setting up a subversion _server_, which AFAIK, is
> a bit of a chore.  The subversion _client_, by contrast, seems to be pretty
> easy to use out of the box, it feels pretty much like CVS.

I was talking about the server, not the client, as Miles guessed.
CVS can be set up as a server trivially, as can Arch.  But Subversion
is *&address@hidden&*^.

All clients can be built, though the subversion client is again, a
pain compared to CVS or Arch.

best,
-tony

-- 
address@hidden            http://www.analytics.washington.edu/ 
Biomedical and Health Informatics   University of Washington
Biostatistics, SCHARP/HVTN          Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
UW (Tu/Th/F): 206-616-7630 FAX=206-543-3461 | Voicemail is unreliable
FHCRC  (M/W): 206-667-7025 FAX=206-667-4812 | use Email

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachments may be
confidential and privileged. If you received this message in error,
please destroy it and notify the sender. Thank you.