[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: category version limited to digits and dots
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: category version limited to digits and dots |
Date: |
20 May 2004 10:52:21 +0900 |
Milan Cvetkovic <address@hidden> writes:
> So, I want to say "lets see all the branches project release v1"
>
> $ tla abrowse project--v1
> project
> project--v1-release
> project--v1-release--1.0
> project--v1-release--1.1
>
> but wait, I didn't want v1.1 - I only wanted v1 !
I presume you meant `rbrowse' (where the limit term is a regular
expression), not `abrowse' (wher it's not); then:
tla rbrowse project--v1-
should do what you want.
> tla abrowse, I would like to group branches related to devo-3.0 or
> stable-2.0. Nobody is interested any more for 1.0 and its patches - it
> is in the archive for historical reasons.
tla rbrowse 'project--v[23]\.0-'
> Now I know why this limitation is there (ability to do "tla get
> proj--branch"), but I still wish it weren't. :-)
I'm with you: even though I find the current syntax pretty usable, I
wish arch had a more flexible syntax that allowed arbitrarily nested
components, with `version' components going anywhere the user chooses.
This wouldn't be too hard to do, if starting from scratch -- but we're
not starting from scratch. For better or for worse, arch uses the
syntax it uses; changing it is a Big Deal, and basically isn't going to
happen. So things go...
-Miles
--
I'm beginning to think that life is just one long Yoko Ono album; no rhyme
or reason, just a lot of incoherent shrieks and then it's over. --Ian Wolff
- [Gnu-arch-users] category version limited to digits and dots, Milan Cvetkovic, 2004/05/14
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: category version limited to digits and dots, Greek0, 2004/05/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: category version limited to digits and dots, Milan Cvetkovic, 2004/05/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: category version limited to digits and dots, Greek0, 2004/05/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: category version limited to digits and dots, Milan Cvetkovic, 2004/05/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: category version limited to digits and dots,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: category version limited to digits and dots, Milan Cvetkovic, 2004/05/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: category version limited to digits and dots, James Blackwell, 2004/05/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: category version limited to digits and dots, James Blackwell, 2004/05/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: category version limited to digits and dots, Milan Cvetkovic, 2004/05/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: category version limited to digits and dots, Milan Cvetkovic, 2004/05/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: category version limited to digits and dots, James Blackwell, 2004/05/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: category version limited to digits and dots, Clark McGrew, 2004/05/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: category version limited to digits and dots, James Blackwell, 2004/05/25
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] category version limited to digits and dots, James Blackwell, 2004/05/14
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] category version limited to digits and dots, Johannes Berg, 2004/05/15